<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Montreal Philosophy &#187; skepticism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://montrealphilosophy.com/tag/skepticism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://montrealphilosophy.com</link>
	<description>&#34;Philosophy&#34; is just a brand for a form of thought that seeks understanding in all its depth.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 00:24:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Eye on the News: Surveys and Lingusitic Barriers</title>
		<link>http://montrealphilosophy.com/eye-on-the-news-surveys-and-lingusitic-barriers/</link>
		<comments>http://montrealphilosophy.com/eye-on-the-news-surveys-and-lingusitic-barriers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 03:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dussault</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethnocentrism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[language barriers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skepticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[survey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://montrealphilosophy.com/?p=461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
We have to be careful when reading the news, because many articles are misleading at least in one way (though the mistakes are usually innocent). Statistics are too often without context and, without easily accessible sources, they&#8217;re difficult to verify. Here&#8217;s an example of potentially flawed statistics:
Not even one in five 18- to 24-year-old French [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://montrealphilosophy.com/eye-on-the-news-surveys-and-lingusitic-barriers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
