<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Montreal Philosophy &#187; michael moore</title>
	<atom:link href="http://montrealphilosophy.com/tag/michael-moore/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://montrealphilosophy.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 21:29:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Bowling For Columbine is shit, #2</title>
		<link>http://montrealphilosophy.com/bowling-for-columbine-is-shit-2/</link>
		<comments>http://montrealphilosophy.com/bowling-for-columbine-is-shit-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 13:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dussault</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bowling for columbine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[documentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michael moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[murder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[violence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://montrealphilosophy.com/?p=326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
I have previously written an article on the subject, entitled &#8220;Bowling For Columbine is shit.&#8221;, but I had not seen the film in quite some time when I wrote that and my focus was not on flaws with the documentary itself, but with the general position supported by its fans and, to some extent, Michael [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://montrealphilosophy.com/bowling-for-columbine-is-shit-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bowling for Columbine is shit.</title>
		<link>http://montrealphilosophy.com/bowling-for-columbine-is-shit/</link>
		<comments>http://montrealphilosophy.com/bowling-for-columbine-is-shit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 15:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dussault</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bowling for columbine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michael moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[murder]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://montrealphilosophy.com/?p=82</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
There was perhaps no financial incentive for Michael Moore to take an intelligent and sensible approach to firearm laws &#8212; people like to see a black and white approach to political issues, and they like a touch of humour &#8211;, but that doesn&#8217;t change the fact that Bowling for Columbine is a shitty documentary. By [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://montrealphilosophy.com/bowling-for-columbine-is-shit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
