<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Montreal Philosophy &#187; liberalism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://montrealphilosophy.com/tag/liberalism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://montrealphilosophy.com</link>
	<description>&#34;Philosophy&#34; is just a brand for a form of thought that seeks understanding in all its depth.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 00:24:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Liberalism and Primitivism: Choice, or the natural and primitive life?</title>
		<link>http://montrealphilosophy.com/liberalism-and-primitivism-choice-or-the-natural-and-primitive-life/</link>
		<comments>http://montrealphilosophy.com/liberalism-and-primitivism-choice-or-the-natural-and-primitive-life/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 19:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dussault</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[happiness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[primitive]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://montrealphilosophy.com/?p=489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
I tend to believe that philosophical differences boil down to differences in terms of values, of which none is better than the other since they are essentially assumptions about the nature of our world. The conflict between primitivism and liberalism serves as a fine example:
When I speak as a liberal, one of the most wonderful [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://montrealphilosophy.com/liberalism-and-primitivism-choice-or-the-natural-and-primitive-life/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Value of Wealth Inequalities</title>
		<link>http://montrealphilosophy.com/the-value-of-wealth-inequalities/</link>
		<comments>http://montrealphilosophy.com/the-value-of-wealth-inequalities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 19:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dussault</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fairness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inequality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pragmaticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://montrealphilosophy.com/?p=419</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Let&#8217;s consider these words by Winston Churchill:
The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries.
I would not extend this to the economic systems of capitalism and socialism, but still, it holds a certain truth:
Something that is too often ignored is the value [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://montrealphilosophy.com/the-value-of-wealth-inequalities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A liberal&#8217;s rant against liberals</title>
		<link>http://montrealphilosophy.com/a-liberals-rant-against-liberals/</link>
		<comments>http://montrealphilosophy.com/a-liberals-rant-against-liberals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 19:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dussault</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[individual rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal responsibility]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://montrealphilosophy.com/?p=171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(recommended Artist: Karsh Kale &#8211; Distance)
REMINDER: I use &#8220;liberal&#8221; in the original sense of the term, so those who identify liberalism as &#8220;the left&#8221; &#8212; a mistake common in the United States and English Canada &#8212; should perhaps see it as being roughly (roughly) equivalent to &#8220;libertarianism&#8221; or &#8220;classical liberalism&#8221;. Read more about this detailhere [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://montrealphilosophy.com/a-liberals-rant-against-liberals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
