<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Montreal Philosophy &#187; News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://montrealphilosophy.com/category/news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://montrealphilosophy.com</link>
	<description>&#34;Philosophy&#34; is just a brand for a form of thought that seeks understanding in all its depth.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 00:24:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Eye on the News: Surveys and Lingusitic Barriers</title>
		<link>http://montrealphilosophy.com/eye-on-the-news-surveys-and-lingusitic-barriers/</link>
		<comments>http://montrealphilosophy.com/eye-on-the-news-surveys-and-lingusitic-barriers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 03:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dussault</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethnocentrism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[language barriers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skepticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[survey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://montrealphilosophy.com/?p=461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
We have to be careful when reading the news, because many articles are misleading at least in one way (though the mistakes are usually innocent). Statistics are too often without context and, without easily accessible sources, they&#8217;re difficult to verify. Here&#8217;s an example of potentially flawed statistics:
Not even one in five 18- to 24-year-old French [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://montrealphilosophy.com/eye-on-the-news-surveys-and-lingusitic-barriers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bowling For Columbine is shit, #2</title>
		<link>http://montrealphilosophy.com/bowling-for-columbine-is-shit-2/</link>
		<comments>http://montrealphilosophy.com/bowling-for-columbine-is-shit-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 13:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dussault</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bowling for columbine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[documentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michael moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[murder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[violence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://montrealphilosophy.com/?p=326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
I have previously written an article on the subject, entitled &#8220;Bowling For Columbine is shit.&#8221;, but I had not seen the film in quite some time when I wrote that and my focus was not on flaws with the documentary itself, but with the general position supported by its fans and, to some extent, Michael [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://montrealphilosophy.com/bowling-for-columbine-is-shit-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
